Geophysicists, targeted by aroused mob, warn that breaking culture leads to violence

Dorian Abbot, professor of geophysics at the University of Chicago, spoke with Tucker Carlson about how tactics of abolition of culture and diversity, equality and inclusion can result in violence and individuals not being treated with dignity and respect.

Abbot stated that at the height of the Black Lives Matter movement in 2020, he became increasingly concerned.

“A year ago, I was uncomfortable with the way things were going on and off campus,” said Abbot, a 2004 graduate of Harvard, the FOX host.

“I felt uncomfortable with ideologies that discourage discourse because if you can’t talk to the other side, the only option is violence, and I saw how that played out in the summer of 2020 and that made me uncomfortable . “

Along with the unrest, which often turned violent, Abbot also began speaking out against diversity, equality and inclusion in many universities across the country.

“On campus, I was uncomfortable with the variety of diversity, equality and inclusion efforts that I believe discriminate against certain groups of people, and I felt that they were not treated as individuals who deserve dignity and respect. For me, that has to be the basis of every moral system that we implement. ‘

Dorian Abbot, a geophysicist from the University of Chicago, spoke to Tucker Carlson about the disadvantages of demolition culture and the tactics of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI).

Abbot was told that a scheduled talk to give at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology was due to his stance on DEI. was canceled

Tucker Carlson spoke to Abbot about DEI on his Tucker Carlson Today show

Carlson agreed with the professor and explained his point of view when he said, “That individuals have value as individuals different from their group identity.”

Abbot stated that he believes in helping disadvantaged people and listed some of his charity activities, but ultimately said that his problem is, “We have to ultimately treat everyone as an individual and I am not comfortable with a university saying good . ” You are an Asian student so we’re not giving you the same chance as another student. ‘

Abbot is a Ph.D. in Applied Mathematics, who received his bachelor’s degree in physics from Harvard University before joining the University of Chicago as a Chamberlin Fellow in 2009 and then a faculty member.

His main research interests are atmospheres, oceans, ice as well as climate and planetary sciences as well as cosmochemistry.

On his University of Chicago page, Abbot wrote, “I practice fair admissions: I choose students and postdocs based on academic ability and promise, and I don’t discriminate against applicants for anything else. I encourage freedom of expression and the creative exploration of ideas in my group. ‘

Abbot’s appearance on Tucker Carlson Today comes after posting an article in Bari Weiss’ Substack newsletter on October 5 stating that his MIT talk was canceled because of his rejection of DEI admission tactics.

“I’m a professor who just canceled a prestigious public science lecture at MIT because of an outraged mob on Twitter,” he wrote.

“My crime? Argue for academic assessments based on academic performance. ‘ Many progressives now argue that equity – equality of outcomes – is more important than equality – giving everyone equal opportunities. ”

Abbot wrote that he has been a “bright” student target since last year when he posted several videos on YouTube denouncing the riots in Chicago that broke out after the police murder of George Floyd.

The professor said that he is usually reluctant to speak out on politics, “but the street violence in the summer of 2020, some of which I witnessed in person in Chicago, and the justifications and dishonesties that went with it, convinced me I wasn’t anymore can.” keep silent with a clear conscience. ‘

Abbot has posted clips on YouTube advocating the importance of treating each person as a person worthy of dignity and respect and “giving fair and equal opportunities to everyone when applying for a job and them to allow their opinions to be expressed Opinions openly, even if you disagree with them. ‘

According to Abbot, this didn’t fit well with a group of PhD students in the Department of Geophysical Sciences at the University of Chicago where he worked.

Abbot wrote that he was “immediately targeted for resignation”. A graduate student organized a letter sent to the Ford Foundation Fellowship Program listserv that makes it easier for an organization to send an email to a group of people.

The Ford Foundation Fellowship Program is a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit whose mission is its commitment to “Creativity and Free Expression”.

The program also claims not-for-profit status, which allows it to claim tax benefits from the Internal Revenue Service on the condition that it does not engage in “political and legislative (lobbying) activities”.

The letter, organized by the students, claimed that Abbot “threatens the safety and belonging of all underrepresented groups within the department”.

A copy of the letter was included in Abbott’s comment. The names of the students have been blackened out, but their pronouns have been added at the end of their signatures.

They demanded that Abbot’s teaching and research “be restricted in a way that would cripple my ability to function as a scientist,” the professor writes.

But the letter failed when UC President Robert Zimmer released a statement declaring the school’s support for the faculty’s right to freedom of expression.

Things changed in August when Abbot co-wrote an opinion piece for Newsweek arguing that the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiative being launched in many colleges across the country was “the ethical and legal Principle of equality violated ”. Treatment.’

Abbot was denied the opportunity to deliver the Carlson Lecture, devoted to “New Outcomes in Climate Science,” hosted by MIT’s Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences. The picture above shows the MIT campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts

Abbot published an article on the dangers of abandonment culture in Bari Weiss’ Substack newsletter after his prestigious MIT talk was canceled

Abbot is a vocal opponent of DEI who he does not believe is treating people “as individuals who deserve dignity and respect”

‘Equity’ vs. ‘Equality’: The new buzzword explained

At first glance, “equality” and “equality” appear to be synonymous when looking up the terms in the dictionary.

According to Merriam-Webster, “just” means “fair and equitable dealings with all parties involved”, while “equal” means “equal measure, same amount, same amount or same number as others”.

But the social justice movement in the United States uses the terms to mean different things.

While “equality” means giving the same resources to all, “justice” means distributing resources according to the needs of the recipients.

Critics of the term justice – often used by President Biden – say it is used by modern supporters to push for equality of outcomes.

They say that equality – that is, giving everyone equal opportunities – is a fairer way of doing things.

According to Abbot and co-author Professor Ivan Marinovic, DEI “treats people only as a means to an end and gives a statistic priority over the individuality of a person.”

Instead, Abbot and Marinovic proposed “an alternative framework called Merit, Fairness and Equality (MFE), in which applicants are treated as individuals and assessed through a rigorous and impartial process based solely on their merit and qualifications”.

The two academics believe MFE “would put an end to the legacy and athletic admissions perks that greatly favor white applicants”.

In response to Newsweek’s comment, critics on Twitter called for Abbot to be denied the opportunity to offer academic seminars and to select other speakers to replace him.

The online campaign against Abbot escalated last month when students lobbied MIT to prevent him from delivering the Carlson Lecture, “a great honor in my field,” the professor said.

Abbot, who was invited to give the talk last January, writes that a “Twitter mob” has started asking MIT to ban him from the talk.

‘It worked. And quickly ”, says Abt.

He said the chairman of EAPS at MIT phoned him on September 30th to say that prestigious Boston University would cancel the annual lecture “to avoid controversy.”

Abbot lamented the fact that “a small group of ideologues launched a Twitter campaign to cancel a prestigious academic lecture at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology because they disagreed with some of the speaker’s political positions.

“And they were successful within eight days.”

“I consider this episode to be an example and a striking example of the threat that awakened ideology poses to our culture, institutions and freedoms,” wrote Abbot.

“I have said time and again that the awakened ideology is essentially totalitarian: it tries to classify the whole of human existence in a narrow ideological view and to silence anyone who disagrees.”

Abbot’s speech has been postponed for Princeton University, and thousands of people signed up for the long-distance presentation last Thursday.

Leave a Comment